Built to rank.
Built to be cited.
Technical articles that win Google clicks and AI-answer citations — drafted from your product knowledge, checked against your sources, approved by your team.
No credit card required. See pricing →
Designing Zero-Downtime API Key Rotation
target: "api key rotation zero downtime"
Idempotency Keys That Survive Retries
target: "idempotency keys retry safe"
Rate Limiting Without Client Pain
target: "rate limiting best practices api"
From the maker of mdedit.ai, joined by 7,300+ users.
EducativeDescopeFingerprintThis is what ships.
Captured from one staged Cowrite workspace — the article, the gap it targets, its visuals, and the approval trail behind it.
Claims that hold up to technical readers
Every claim is checked against your source material before your team sees it. What cannot be verified is flagged, not published quietly.
A gap you can actually win
Every article starts from a real query, a documented audience, and a content gap worth owning.
Diagrams that live with the draft
Mermaid source and rendered output stay in the article workflow, reviewable alongside the prose and code.
Approved before it reaches readers
Outline and draft approvals, revisions, and generation events, recorded with actor and timestamp. Nothing ships without your team's sign-off.
Most AI content fails your readers before it reaches them.
AI writes about whatever you ask. Without search data, it's guessing.
Every brief starts from real keyword gaps, competitor titles, and rank proximity.
AI that doesn't know what kind of article it's writing produces the same vague structure for everything.
Article type determines the skeleton. Your source material determines what goes in it.
AI that hasn't read your docs writes around them. It invents what it can't find.
The draft is checked against your source material before it reaches your team.
Volume content tools publish fast. Technical claims that aren't grounded in your documentation ship to your readers as fact.
Source checks run against your product docs before any draft reaches review. What can't be verified is flagged, not published.
Keyword tools tell you what to cover. They can't write from your product documentation, your use cases, or how your product actually works.
Cowrite connects to your source material and drafts from it. Every article reflects your product, not a generic description of the category.
Generic AI has no memory of how you sound. Every article reinvents your voice from scratch.
A Brand Voice Profile trains on your published writing and applies your style to every draft.
How every article gets there.
Research
Shape a brief around search intent, audience, article type, priority, and the opportunity your product can credibly own.
Nothing ships without your sign-off.
You set the bar once — which stages need approval, how deep research goes, what SEO structure and article length look like — and every article meets it, no matter who is in the queue that day.
Content tools optimize for keywords. Cowrite builds technical articles that teach.
If your content strategy is volume at any quality, there are cheaper tools. If it is ranking on technical queries your competitors cannot answer without your documentation, that is what Cowrite is for.
Keyword tools tell you what to cover
Clearscope grades content against top-ranking pages. Surfer closes the loop with monitoring. Neither drafts from your product documentation, so the writing still starts from a blank page.
Volume tools ship fast, unverified
Outrank and similar autopilot tools publish at scale with no formal check against your source material. Technical claims that are wrong ship to your readers as fact.
Cowrite ships articles only your company could write
Search data shapes the brief. Your product documentation shapes the draft. Every technical claim is checked against that source material before your team reviews it.
Why I'm building Cowrite
I've shipped technical tutorials and product explainers across publications and company blogs. The hard part was rarely the first draft. It was knowing what was worth writing, keeping the draft tied to product reality, and making every claim hold up to a technical reader.
Cowrite comes from the same writing and product-building experience behind mdedit.ai, my markdown editor for technical writers. Cowrite carries that discipline earlier into the pipeline: search opportunity, source-aware drafting, and review gates before anything ships.
Cowrite is early. The roadmap says plainly what doesn't exist yet.
Read the full story →Built for technical teams and the founders who know their product.
Predictable output at scale without sacrificing technical credibility. Cowrite handles keyword research, source-checked drafts, and approval workflows, so your team focuses on decisions, not drafts.
See plans for teams →Your product docs, your use cases, your voice. Cowrite drafts from what you know and produces articles that reflect the product, not a generic description of it.
Start free →FAQ
Questions worth answering upfront.
What does Cowrite cost?
Pro starts at $29/month ($290/year), Scale starts at $79/month ($790/year). Both plans include a 3-day free trial, card required, cancel anytime.
What is real today versus on the roadmap?
Research, briefs, outlines, drafting, source-checking, visual generation, and review gates are live today. Publishing currently means downloading the approved article as Markdown, HTML, PDF, DOCX, or ODT. Direct CMS integrations (WordPress, Ghost, HubSpot) are on the roadmap, not live yet.
How does the approval workflow work?
Projects can require approval at the outline and draft stages. Your team approves before the pipeline continues, or requests changes with specific feedback. Approvals, revisions, and generation events are recorded with actor and timestamp.
Which visual engines does Cowrite use?
Cowrite can generate diagrams and charts using Mermaid, Plotly, D3, Vega-Lite, Graphviz, and Matplotlib, plus AI-generated cover images and illustrations, styled consistently with the rest of the article.
Does Cowrite check claims against my documentation?
Drafts are checked against the product or source material you provide before they are treated as publication-ready. This is a technical review pass, not a guarantee that every claim is valid, and it is not a full ingestion of a company knowledge base.
What is a Brand Voice Profile?
A learned representation of your team's writing voice, built from your existing published content. It keeps tone, vocabulary, and heading style consistent across drafts instead of reinventing your voice every article.
What happens to my data?
Your projects, drafts, and connected source material stay in your workspace. Google Search Console performance tracking is connection-level and only active for accounts you connect.
Turn your product knowledge into rankings.
Source-checked against your docs. Approved by your team. Ready to rank.
No credit card required.